SUSTAINABILITY TNFD Proposal Initiatives

Basic Approach to Natural Capital and Biodiversity

The central goal of the Lawson Group (hereafter, the Group) is to put its Group Philosophy, “Creating Happiness and Harmony in Our Communities,” into practice. Part of these efforts is upholding the Lawson Group Environmental Policy*1 as a fundamental principle. Based on this principle, the Group strives to ensure that the rich blessings of the Earth can be passed on to future generations by conducting business activities with constant consideration for the natural environment and local communities, while actively promoting coexistence with society and sustainable development.
Lawson (hereafter, the Company), as the Group’s core company, identifies issues it considers important in advancing business activities as material issues (materiality)*2, determined from the standpoint of customers, based on the “Three Promises” in its business policy, while also taking into account social issues and circumstances across the Company’s value chain. These material issues emphasize the most critical aspects for the retail industry—safety, security, and our role as social infrastructure—and are determined from a customer-first perspective. Our environmental conservation initiatives are based on the “friendliness for communities (Machi)” promise in the “Three Promises” business policy. As part of our “sustainable environment preservation activities toward a carbon-free society,” we set social and environmental goals (KPIs) and work toward achieving them.
In December 2023, the Company endorsed the TNFD*3concept, and registered as a TNFD Early Adopter in January 2024 in recognition of our adoption of the TNFD disclosure recommendations at an early stage. As a Group, we will organize our ongoing initiatives on natural capital based on TNFD recommendations, and promote initiatives such as the sustainable use of resources with consideration for biodiversity, as well as further enhance information disclosure.

*1 Find out more about “Lawson Group Environmental Policy”

*2 Find out more about “Lawson’s Material Issues”

*3 TNFD
Abbreviation for Task Force on Nature-Related Financial Disclosures. An international initiative to establish a framework for organizations and companies to assess and disclose their impacts on natural capital and biodiversity through their economic activities.

Disclosure Approach Based on TNFD Recommendations

In September 2023, the final TNFD recommendations were published as version 1.0. These recommendations require disclosure based on four pillars: governance, strategy, risk and impact management, and metrics and targets.
Our Company conducted analyses of the Group’s business activities based on expert advice, referring to the LEAP approach. The LEAP approach, developed by TNFD as an integrated method to assess nature-related issues, recommends analysis and evaluation based on LEAP.

TNFD’s Four Pillars

  • Governance
    Disclose governance of nature-related dependencies, impacts, risks, and opportunities.
  • Strategy
    Disclose the impacts of nature-related dependencies, impacts, risks, and opportunities on the organization’s business model, strategy, and financial planning, where such information is material.
  • Risk and impact management
    Describe processes used to identify, assess, prioritize, and monitor nature-related dependencies, impacts, risks, and opportunities.
  • Metrics and targets
    Disclose metrics and targets used to assess and manage material nature-related dependencies, impacts, risks, and opportunities.

Source: “Recommendations of the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures”

LEAP Approach Overview

The LEAP approach consists of five steps: Scoping, Locate, Evaluate, Assess, and Prepare. Scoping defines the scope of the assessment. Locate identifies points of contact with nature. Evaluate diagnoses dependencies on and impacts to nature. Assess involves evaluating nature-related risks and opportunities. Prepare involves making preparations to address nature-related risks and opportunities.

Overview of Initiatives Based on the Four Pillars

Governance

Structure

To promote responses to social issues, the Company has appointed the President and CEO as CSO (Chief Sustainability Officer), who leads sustainability-related initiatives across the Group. In addition, the Sustainability Committee, whose core members include the heads of departments related to sustainability, deliberates and determines directions for important sustainability issues such as decarbonization, natural capital, and biodiversity. Working groups and similar bodies are established under the Committee to examine measures for particularly important issues and to advance initiatives.

Strategy

Understanding Dependencies and Impacts on Natural Capital

In conducting business activities, our Company affects the natural environment through store construction and operations, while also relying on natural resources such as timber, water, and other raw materials in the development and sale of products. These business activities are heavily dependent on the rich blessings of the Earth, and without biodiversity, our business itself would not be sustainable.
Throughout the entire value chain—from raw material procurement, product manufacturing, and distribution to store operations—we identify dependencies and impacts on natural capital and promote initiatives for its conservation and regeneration (see “Analysis of Dependencies and Impacts Across the Group’s Businesses” below for details). At the raw material procurement stage in particular, we are strongly dependent on natural capital within the value chain, so we have established the Lawson Group Procurement Policy*4. Under this policy, we are working on the development and sale of products using certified materials that consider biodiversity, responsible use of resources, and waste reduction.
Going forward, we will continue to actively pursue initiatives to achieve nature-positive outcomes*5—halting and reversing biodiversity loss to put ecosystems on a path to recovery.

*4 Find out more about “Lawson Group Procurement Policy”

*5 Nature-positive outcomes: Halting and reversing biodiversity loss to place nature on a recovery trajectory.

Risk Management

Management Structure

To identify risks that significantly affect business management, analyze their potential impacts, and take appropriate responses according to risk characteristics, the Company has established a Company-wide Compliance and Risk Management Committee under the CRO (Chief Compliance and Risk Officer). This committee annually identifies risks associated with business activities and creates risk scenarios, including those related to climate change, biodiversity, human rights, and other social issues. Each risk scenario is assessed based on impact level and frequency of occurrence. Those deemed to have the potential for significant impact on financial conditions, business performance, cash flow, or strategy are designated as material risks, and we take measures to prevent their occurrence or mitigate damage if they arise.

Metrics and Targets

Environmental Vision

Targeting 2025, the Company’s 50th anniversary, and 2030, the SDGs milestone year, we have established social and environmental goals (KPIs) and are working diligently toward their achievement. As an additional long-term goal, we formulated the Environmental Vision “Lawson Blue Challenge 2050!”*6to help build a carbon-free society by 2050 and pass on a blue, abundant global environment to the future. We are advancing initiatives to address environmental challenges such as reducing CO2emissions, reducing food loss and waste, and reducing use of plastic in containers and packaging and plastic shopping bags, while striving to achieve the targets for 2025, 2030, and 2050.

*6 Find out more about the Environmental Vision “Lawson Blue Challenge 2050!”

Analysis of Dependencies and Impacts Across the Group’s Businesses

We conducted an analysis of how the Group’s businesses and value chain interact with nature. For example, when manufacturing rice balls sold in stores, raw materials such as rice and fillings benefit from various ecosystem services. On the other hand, the manufacturing process consumes energy and emits GHGs (greenhouse gases), thereby impacting the natural environment.

Relationship Between Nature and Business Activities

The diagram summarizes the relationship between nature and business activities. Nature provides services that businesses use and depend on, while business activities impact natural capital. The services provided by nature include ecosystem services and abiotic services, which are utilized in business activities. Natural capital such as plants, animals, air, water, land, and minerals are in turn affected by land and resource use and development, as well as emissions of GHGs and pollutants.

Accordingly, we analyzed the Group’s dependencies and impacts on natural capital within its business sectors using ENCORE*7.
The analysis covers direct operations and the upstream and downstream segments of the value chain across the five business segments operated by the Group: Domestic Convenience Store Business, Supermarket Business, Entertainment-related Business, Financial-related Business, and Overseas Business.

*7 ENCORE is a tool for identifying the degree of dependency and impact on natural capital by sector and production process, based on industry classifications.

Business Segments and Industry Classifications

The Domestic Convenience Store Business, Supermarket Business, and Overseas Business cover a broad range of activities from primary production to processing, manufacturing, and retail. The Group also engages in Entertainment-related and Financial-related Businesses.

First, we organized the industry classifications relevant to direct operations and value chains in each business sector of the Group. Using ENCORE, we evaluated the degree of dependency and impact on natural capital within these classifications on a five-point scale from “Very High (VH)=5” to “Very Low (VL)=1” and calculated the average scores.

Evaluation of Dependencies and Impacts by Industry Classification

The analysis revealed that across the Group’s businesses, dependencies are particularly high on raw material supply such as agricultural, livestock, and fishery production; water (supply); and environmental maintenance for raw material production such as soil retention. On the other hand, impacts are particularly high in solid waste derived from fertilizers and feed used in agricultural, livestock, and fishery production, raw material supply; water (use); direct adverse impacts on biodiversity caused by store construction, transportation, noise, and light; and GHG emissions.

Examples of Major Dependencies and Impacts in Group Businesses

  Evaluation Items Main Examples in the Group
Dependencies Raw material supply Production of ingredients for products (such as boxed meals and rice balls)
Water (supply) Use in the production process of raw materials and in stores
Environmental maintenance for raw material production, such as soil retention During the production process of raw materials
Impacts Raw material supply Use of resources in raw material procurement
Water (use) Use in raw material and product manufacturing, and in stores
Direct adverse impacts on biodiversity, such as noise and light Land development and store construction
GHG emissions Use of electricity in stores, raw material procurement, use of trucks for product distribution, etc.
Emissions of waste and pollutants Food waste, air pollutants from transportation

Identification of Raw Materials with High Dependence on and Impact to Natural Capital

Across all Group businesses, we have identified that dependence on and impact to natural capital are particularly high in the agricultural, livestock, and fishery production associated with the Group’s main products and services. Among agricultural, livestock, and fishery products, we have compiled a list of raw materials with particularly high impact on natural capital*8. Within this list, coffee beans have been selected for further in-depth analysis, given the Group’s large handling volume.

List of Raw Materials with High Impact on Natural Capital

  • Beef
  • Cocoa
  • Coffee beans
  • Cotton
  • Dairy products
  • Marine products
  • Corn
  • Palm oil
  • Pork
  • Potatoes
  • Chicken
  • Rice
  • Soy
  • Sugarcane
  • Timber
  • Tobacco
  • Wheat
  • Others

*8 A framework called “SBTs for Nature” has been published which sets targets in the field of nature. As of July 2024, more than 30 items are covered.

Analysis of the Coffee Value Chain

Evaluation of Dependencies and Impacts

The coffee value chain was broken down into land development, raw material production, processing and roasting, distribution, and sales, and the relationships of dependencies and impacts were clarified.
It was found that in the upstream stages of land development and raw material production, the degree of dependence on and impact to nature is particularly high. Dependencies are high on GHG (functions for stable and regulated climate) and water supply. On the other hand, impacts are high for solid waste (waste emissions), direct adverse impacts on biodiversity (noise and light), and water use.
Since the evaluation by ENCORE is based on general figures, some qualitative assessments have been conducted in light of the characteristics of the Group’s value chain, and the results are reflected in the table below.

Relationship Between Coffee Value Chain and Nature

Looking at the relationship with nature in the coffee value chain, land development relies on GHG emissions and may impact water supply and usage or cause direct adverse impacts on biodiversity. Raw material production heavily depends on GHG, raw material supply, water, and environmental management of raw material organisms, while processing and roasting rely heavily on water. Sales depend on well-being, and distribution may cause direct adverse impacts on biodiversity.

Dependencies and Impacts in the Coffee Value Chain (Very High and High only, extracted)

Among land development, raw material production, processing and roasting, distribution, and sales, dependencies and impacts are particularly high in land development and raw material production. Dependencies in land development include GHG (functions for stable and regulated climate) and raw material production (soil retention and soil quality). Impacts in land development include solid waste (emissions of waste), water (water use), and direct impacts on biodiversity (such as noise and light). Dependencies in raw material production include GHG (functions for stable and regulated climate), raw material production (pollination, soil retention, soil quality), and water (supply). Impacts in raw material production include raw material production (available land area), solid waste (emissions of waste), water (water use), and direct impacts (such as noise and light).

Management of Risks and Opportunities

The risks and opportunities in the Group’s businesses are greatly influenced by the relationship of dependence and impact on nature. Ahead of our scheduled scenario analysis, we organized risks and opportunities expected in the coffee value chain using sector-specific guidance based on the TNFD recommendations.

Management of Risks and Opportunities in the Coffee Value Chain

Risks/Opportunities Category Examples of Major Expected Risks and Opportunities
Physical risks Acute Decreased harvest yields and increased procurement costs due to rising temperatures
Decreased harvest yields and increased procurement costs due to water shortages and droughts
Decreased harvest yields and increased procurement costs due to natural disasters
Chronic Increased burden of changing procurement sources due to changes in suitable cultivation areas caused by rising average temperatures
Increased costs for machine or manual pollination due to decline in natural pollinators
Increased disaster insurance costs due to the loss of natural mitigation functions (climate regulation, flood control, soil retention, etc.)
Transition risks Policy/Legal Increased costs for compliance due to stricter GHG emission regulations
Increased costs for compliance due to stricter regulations related to natural capital
Technology Increased costs for shifting to agricultural practices with lower environmental impact
Increased costs for transitioning to systems that reduce food waste generation
Market/Reputation Decline in brand image due to delays in addressing environmental considerations in raw material procurement
Decline in brand image due to delays in addressing food waste reduction
Opportunities Resource efficiency Reduced water use through the introduction of water-saving and recycling technologies
Reduced energy consumption through efficiency and optimization of distribution
Products/Services Increased sales from offering more sustainably certified food and agricultural products, in line with changes in consumer lifestyles and preferences
Increased revenue through reuse of food loss and waste
Reputation Enhanced brand image through the development of environmentally conscious products and services

Detailed Analysis of Major Risks

In the coffee value chain, dependence and impact on water resources are significant and greatly influence the risks and opportunities identified for this value chain. The severity of water risks varies significantly by region.
The Company operates an in-store freshly brewed coffee service, MACHI café, and the countries and regions from which coffee beans are procured are important areas for the Company’s business. Using the water risk assessment tool Aqueduct*9, an analysis was conducted of the risks related to water resources at the 12 coffee farms (Sites A – L) located in Brazil, Colombia, Guatemala, and Tanzania, which are the Company’s main coffee bean procurement sources.

*9 A water risk analysis tool provided by WRI (World Resources Institute). Based on location data, it evaluates the specified types of risk at the given site on a six-level scale from Low to Extremely High.

Types of Water Risks Analyzed

Risk type Description
Water stress Risk calculated based on total water demand, representing the absolute volume of water withdrawn
Water depletion Ratio of consumption to available supply
Flood risk Annual average number of people affected, calculated from both flood likelihood and estimated affected population
Drought risk Annual average scale of people affected, calculated from both drought likelihood and estimated affected population
Water quality risk Assessed based on an integrated evaluation of two indicators
  • Untreated connected wastewater
    Proportion of wastewater connected to sewage systems that undergo only primary treatment
  • Coastal eutrophication potential
    Potential for large-scale algae blooms along coasts. Calculated based on current nitrogen, phosphorus, and silica concentrations in rivers

Water Risk Analysis by Site

We analyze five items: water stress, water depletion, river flood risk, drought risk, and water quality risk. The countries analyzed are Guatemala (3 sites), Brazil (3 sites), Tanzania (2 sites), and Colombia (4 sites). Among these, water quality risk is particularly high in Tanzania, while flood risk is high in Guatemala.

Management of Major Risks

Collaboration with Coffee Farms

Since its launch in 2011, our in-store freshly brewed coffee service, MACHI café, has worked to improve the human rights of producers and workers, adopted farming methods aimed at conserving natural capital and biodiversity, and used coffee beans from Rainforest Alliance Certified farms*10that comply with the Rainforest Alliance’s sustainable agriculture standards. Each year, we have increased the proportion of certified farm beans, and in 2015 we achieved 100%*11use of certified beans for coffee and café latte (hot and iced), a practice that continues today.
We also designate farms and production regions and build medium- to long-term trading relationships to secure farms’ economic stability, while providing support for human rights and biodiversity conservation efforts.

*10 Find out more about “ra.org” (external link)
Find out more about initiatives related to “Rainforest Alliance Certification”

*11 Mocha Blend is not of the scope.

Main Initiatives in Line with Rainforest Alliance Certification Requirements

Item Content
Respect for human rights Establishment of systems to prevent child labor, forced labor, discrimination, and workplace violence and harassment
Establishment of systems to promote gender equality and women’s empowerment
Setting guidelines to guarantee minimum wages for farm workers
Setting guidelines on labor conditions (working hours, leave, and benefits)
Setting guidelines to protect workers’ health and safety (clean toilets, safe drinking water, etc.)
Environment preservation GHG emissions Proper management of energy used in production and processing
Waste Proper management of waste to avoid risks to people and natural ecosystems
Water risk Proper management of wastewater from processing
Soil management through soil evaluation at least once every three years and optimizing soil moisture
Maintenance of riparian buffers (buffer zones between rivers and farmland)
Land use Confirmation that natural forests and ecosystems are not converted for agricultural or other land use (since 2014)

Our coffee value chain depends on natural capital and is supported by many stakeholders, including coffee producers.
At the same time, nearly 80% of deforestation is said to be caused by agricultural activity, and risks such as forced and child labor, overuse of resources, and improper waste management cannot be eliminated in coffee sourcing.
To avoid these issues and risks, respect human rights, and conserve the natural environment—i.e., to procure sustainable coffee beans—we promote the use of beans from Rainforest Alliance Certified farms.
Of course, we recognize that the use of certified beans alone does not resolve all issues and risks. Beyond Rainforest Alliance initiatives, we are committed to contributing to the creation of a more sustainable society through various efforts.

Response to Water risks

In the water risk analysis by production region conducted with Aqueduct, coffee farms were identified as being particularly exposed to river flood risk and water quality risk. However, we have confirmed that Rainforest Alliance certification requirements, as well as farm-specific measures, ensure that countermeasures are in place to cover these high-risk areas.

Measures against Water Risks – Rainforest Alliance Certification Requirements

The diagram summarizes water risk response measures through Rainforest Alliance Certification requirements and farm-specific measures. Among water stress, water depletion, river flood risk, drought risk, and water quality risk, certification requirements exist for all except water stress. The requirement for water depletion is soil management, for river flood risk it is maintenance of riparian buffers, for drought risk it is soil management, and for water quality risk it is the management of processing water. In Brazil, farms independently take measures to address water depletion and water quality risks. Similarly, in Guatemala (Site H), measures are taken against flood risk; in Tanzania (Site K), against water stress; and in Tanzania (Sites K and L), against water quality risk. Drought risk is addressed through soil evaluations and optimization of soil moisture. Water quality risk is addressed through maintenance of riparian buffers and by testing and managing wastewater at discharge sites after processing.

Examples of Appropriate Water Resource Use at the Ipanema Farm in Brazil

Drip Irrigation Equipment

Irrigation equipment has been introduced for coffee tree cultivation, and the irrigated area has been expanding each year. By using irrigation equipment, the farm prevents the drying of coffee trees, thereby improving production efficiency and stabilizing yields. The drip irrigation system adopted at the Ipanema Farm delivers water directly to the roots of the coffee trees, making it three to four times more efficient than the pivot method, contributing to water conservation.

Processing Equipment

In the processing stage, where coffee beans are extracted by removing pulp and other components from the cherries, large amounts of water are used for washing after harvest, sorting by water flotation, and fermentation to remove the mucilage surrounding the beans. At the Ipanema Farm, water use in each step is monitored and adjusted to optimal levels, reducing annual water consumption in processing. In 2023, the farm reduced water use per liter of coffee cherries by about 40% compared with 2019.

Social and Environmental Measures Beyond Water Risks

Support for Addressing Social Issues on Coffee Farms

Each farm undertakes initiatives to support workers and local communities to improve living conditions. As a company that uses coffee beans, we help enhance the sustainability of producing regions and producers by supporting these initiatives.
In 2022, to mark the 10th anniversary of MACHI café, we launched the “Let’s Say Thank You to Coffee Producers Project,” and the theme “A future where everyone can easily and safely wash their hands and drink water!” was selected by our customers via voting. At the AVIV Farm in Tanzania, we installed water tanks and provided water delivery by truck, ensuring that all people involved in coffee production, including those far from wells, can access safe water.
Other initiatives include donating books to orphanages to support education and making donations to farm workers.

Water tank installed at the AVIV Farm
Support for children

Environmental Initiatives on Coffee Farms

The Ipanema Farm in Brazil was an early recipient of certifications granted to producers that take environmental considerations into account. The farm practices sustainable coffee cultivation with minimal impact on nature and people through responsible use of resources, while actively working on environmental conservation and biodiversity protection.
Since 2002, the farm has planted more than 455,000 trees*12to conserve biodiversity. It has built facilities for raising seedlings of native forests and established an environmental monitoring center to collect data on weather, forest seeds, and wildlife. In addition, the farm maintains 270 beehives to promote pollination of various native plants and enhance biodiversity.

Facility for cultivating seedlings of native forests
Beehives

*12 Cumulative total from 2002 to 2023

Future Promotion Plans

The Group’s value chain in business activities depends heavily on natural capital at the raw material procurement stage. To address biodiversity issues related to our products, the Sustainability Committee and its working groups will continue to develop policies and advance initiatives such as risk management.
In particular, at the raw material procurement stage, we will promote the development and sale of products using certified materials that take biodiversity into account, the use of such materials in packaging, and the establishment of indicators and targets related to certified materials.



PAGE TOP